From reporting risk to real protection
Balbix delivers risk scores and reports but leaves the real work, patching, up to other tools. Vicarius closes the gap with built-in detection, prioritization, and automated remediation, eliminating reliance on fragile integrations and reducing risk faster, with broader coverage and lower operational overhead.



























































































Vicarius key differentiators
Detection to remediation loop
Built-in native patching
Zero-Day and exploit awareness
Full cross-platform coverage
Fast, integration-free deployment
Complete MSSP-ready multi-tenancy
How Vicarius compares to Balbix

Focuses on risk reports; “remediation” means creating tickets for other tools to handle. Vulnerabilities remain unpatched unless external systems take over.
No virtual patching, if a vendor hasn’t issued a fix, you stay exposed.
MacOS only through integrations; legacy coverage is thin. Heavy dependence on other vendors to fill basic platform gaps.
Limited flexibility; requires integrations for some workloads, adding fragility and complexity.
Scores risk but stops short, no native exploit intel, so high scores don’t always mean fast fixes.
No true multi-tenancy; each customer feels like a separate deployment project.
“Automation” is just integration handoffs, patching is never in-platform, slowing down actual risk reduction.
Heavy reliance on integrations bloats setup time and introduces more moving parts to manage.
Limited built-in coverage; every third-party app requires an integration or separate tool to patch.
G2: 4.8 / Gartner: 4.7 – customers cite lack of CIS benchmarks, no API for workflow integration, missing release notes, and weak hardening capabilities.
