Vicarius
VS
Balbix

From reporting risk to real protection

Balbix delivers risk scores and reports but leaves the real work, patching, up to other tools. Vicarius closes the gap with built-in detection, prioritization, and automated remediation, eliminating reliance on fragile integrations and reducing risk faster, with broader coverage and lower operational overhead.

VS

Vicarius key differentiators

Detection to remediation loop

Balbix stops at reporting. Vicarius detects, prioritizes, and patches vulnerabilities in real time, closing the loop and eliminating the gap between knowing and fixing.

Built-in native patching

No reliance on external tools. Vicarius delivers native patch management for OS and 10K+ apps, while Balbix depends on third-party integrations for basic patching.

Zero-Day and exploit awareness

Vicarius integrates real-time EPSS, KEV and exploit intelligence for proactive risk reduction. Balbix offers no native zero-day patching or exploit-aware prioritization.

Full cross-platform coverage

Vicarius supports Windows, macOS, Linux, legacy systems natively. Balbix’s macOS and legacy coverage is limited and requires integrations.

Fast, integration-free deployment

Vicarius is cloud-native and operational in hours. Balbix’s heavy reliance on integrations increases setup complexity, slows time-to-value, and inflates TCO.

Complete MSSP-ready multi-tenancy

Vicarius offers true multi-tenancy for MSSPs managing multiple customers at scale. Balbix lacks built-in multi-tenancy, relying on complex external workflows.

How Vicarius compares to Balbix

Capabilities
Remediation built-in
Native, no-code remediation with automated patching, exploit-aware workflows, and immediate execution.

Focuses on risk reports; “remediation” means creating tickets for other tools to handle. Vulnerabilities remain unpatched unless external systems take over.

Virtual patching
Enables virtual patching for zero-days and unsupported software

No virtual patching, if a vendor hasn’t issued a fix, you stay exposed.

Cross-platform support
Full patching for Windows, Linux, macOS, and over 10,000 third-party applications

MacOS only through integrations; legacy coverage is thin. Heavy dependence on other vendors to fill basic platform gaps.

Agent-based & agentless modes
Offers both agent-based and agentless scanning for flexible deployment across asset types

Limited flexibility; requires integrations for some workloads, adding fragility and complexity.

Real-time risk prioritization and validation
Prioritizes vulnerabilities using contextual, risk-based analysis that goes beyond CVSS, and validates exploitability in live environments using telemetry, not simulated exploits.

Scores risk but stops short, no native exploit intel, so high scores don’t always mean fast fixes.

Multi-tenancy for MSSPs
MSSP-friendly architecture with tenant isolation, delegated roles, and centralized control

No true multi-tenancy; each customer feels like a separate deployment project.

Workflow Automation
Unified platform for detection, prioritization, and remediation, minimizing tool sprawl

“Automation” is just integration handoffs, patching is never in-platform, slowing down actual risk reduction.

Ease of deployment
Modern, cloud-native UI with fast onboarding and centralized console

Heavy reliance on integrations bloats setup time and introduces more moving parts to manage.

Coverage depth
Covers vulnerabilities across system, apps, network, and even patchless or legacy systems

Limited built-in coverage; every third-party app requires an integration or separate tool to patch.

Customer satisfaction
G2: 4.9 / Gartner: 4.8 praised for ease of use, performance, and support

G2: 4.8 / Gartner: 4.7 – customers cite lack of CIS benchmarks, no API for workflow integration, missing release notes, and weak hardening capabilities.

Resources

Additional Resources

downloadable

MSP whitepaper

article

The CIS Benchmarking Best Practices: Turning Security Guidelines into Operational Resilience

article

From Vulnerability Management to Compliance Confidence: Operationalizing Frameworks with Vicarius vRx

article

Elevating Cybersecurity: Rethinking the SANS Vulnerability Management Maturity Model Through the Lens of Vicarius vRx

article

Machine vs. Machine: The Future of Vulnerability Remediation

Shortlist 2024 by Captera
4.9
Tech leader award by PeerSpot
4.8
Customer first by Gartner
4.8
Leader spring by G2
4.9

Hear from our customers

Complete Vulnerability Remediation Platform

"What stood out was that it wasn’t just a scanner or a patch manager. It was an entire remediation platform. You discover vulnerabilities, prioritize based on real risk, and remediate automatically."
Eric Dowsland
Chief Customer Officer

My favorite feature is Patchless Protection

"With Vicarius' vRx, I've never seen a patch that failed or had to be rolled back. We're saving quite a bit of time. Our clients using vRx haven't had any issues, and they've easily established patching for all their endpoints."
No items found.
Jeremy Herman
Security Engineer

Great patching capabilities, helpful dashboard, and excellent support

"vRx has saved us an incredible amount of time. We can just rely on the automated system and the schedules we've set. It's a huge time saver. It's saved us hundreds of hours."
No items found.
Michael Cortez
Sr. Director of IT

EL AL secures global Patch Compliance

“Within two weeks we decided on Vicarius. Patch scheduling is now a one-day task instead of a full-time job.”
Tal Shachar
Deputy Director, Infrastructure, EL AL Airlines

Unified vulnerability discovery, prioritization, and remediation

"Vicarius streamlines vulnerability management between IT & Security by directly linking identified vulnerabilities to required patches, enhancing efficiency. The automation process has saved at least 30 percent of our manual tasks."
No items found.
Wayne Ajimine
Information Security Professional
4.9/5 stars on

Remediate more vulns
with Vicarus